stork: clatter beaks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.59
, species
Weight: 0.53
, man
Weight: 0.52
, animal
Weight: 0.46
, alligator
Weight: 0.45
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.36
, heron
Weight: 0.35
, robin
Weight: 0.35
, owl
Weight: 0.35
, wren
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
clatter beaks 1.00
clack beaks 0.88
clap beaks 0.84
have long beaks 0.80
has physical part beaks 0.78
click beaks 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(stork, clatter beaks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(heron, have long beaks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(stork, clatter beaks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(heron, have long beaks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(heron, have long beaks)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part beaks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(stork, clatter beaks)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(stork, clack beaks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(stork, clack beaks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(stork, clap beaks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(stork, clack beaks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(stork, clap beaks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(stork, clap beaks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(stork, clack beaks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(stork, click beaks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(stork, click beaks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(stork, clap beaks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(stork, has physical part beaks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(stork, click beaks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(stork, has physical part beaks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(stork, click beaks)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(stork, have long beaks)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(stork, has physical part beaks)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(stork, have long beaks)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(stork, have long beaks)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(stork, have long beaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(stork, clatter beaks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(stork, clatter beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(heron, have long beaks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(stork, clatter beaks)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)