stork: has physical part beaks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.59
, species
Weight: 0.53
, man
Weight: 0.52
, animal
Weight: 0.46
, alligator
Weight: 0.45
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.36
, heron
Weight: 0.35
, robin
Weight: 0.35
, owl
Weight: 0.35
, wren
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part beaks 1.00
have long beaks 0.94
clap beaks 0.86
click beaks 0.83
clack beaks 0.82
has physical part legs 0.80
clatter beaks 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(stork, has physical part beaks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part legs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(heron, have long beaks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(stork, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(heron, have long beaks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(heron, have long beaks)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(heron, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part legs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(stork, has physical part beaks)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(stork, have long beaks)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(stork, clap beaks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(stork, click beaks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(stork, clap beaks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(stork, click beaks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(stork, clack beaks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(stork, clap beaks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(stork, clack beaks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(stork, clatter beaks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(stork, clack beaks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(stork, click beaks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(stork, clatter beaks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(stork, has physical part legs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(stork, clap beaks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(stork, clack beaks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(stork, has physical part legs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(stork, click beaks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(stork, clatter beaks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(stork, has physical part legs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(stork, have long beaks)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(stork, have long beaks)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(stork, clatter beaks)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(stork, have long beaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(stork, has physical part beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part legs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(heron, have long beaks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(stork, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)