stork: has physical part legs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.59
, species
Weight: 0.53
, man
Weight: 0.52
, animal
Weight: 0.46
, alligator
Weight: 0.45
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.36
, heron
Weight: 0.35
, robin
Weight: 0.35
, owl
Weight: 0.35
, wren
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part legs 1.00
have long legs 0.90
has physical part beaks 0.80
sleep on one leg 0.78
stand on one leg 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(stork, has physical part legs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bird, stand on one leg)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(stork, has physical part legs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(bird, stand on one leg)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bird, stand on one leg)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(heron, stand on one leg)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part legs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(heron, have long legs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(stork, has physical part legs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bird, stand on one leg)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(stork, has physical part legs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(heron, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part legs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(heron, have long legs)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(heron, have long legs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(heron, stand on one leg)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(heron, stand on one leg)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(stork, has physical part legs)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(stork, have long legs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(stork, sleep on one leg)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(stork, sleep on one leg)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(stork, sleep on one leg)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(stork, sleep on one leg)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(stork, stand on one leg)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(stork, stand on one leg)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(stork, has physical part beaks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(stork, has physical part beaks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(stork, has physical part beaks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(stork, stand on one leg)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(stork, have long legs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(stork, stand on one leg)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(stork, have long legs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(stork, have long legs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(stork, has physical part legs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(bird, stand on one leg)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part legs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(heron, stand on one leg)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(heron, have long legs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(bird, stand on one leg)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(stork, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)