storm: be given names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad weather
Weight: 0.66
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
, emergency
Weight: 0.59
, character
Weight: 0.58
Siblings typhoon
Weight: 0.74
, tornado
Weight: 0.71
, hurricane
Weight: 0.66
, rita
Weight: 0.63
, thunderstorm
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be given names 1.00
be given human names 0.92
get names 0.92
have names 0.92
be given female names 0.91
be called names 0.90
need names 0.90
have different names 0.89
has state names 0.87
be named names 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, be given names)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tornado, have names)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be given female names)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be given names)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, have different names)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, have names)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, get names)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be given human names)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, have names)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(typhoon, be given names)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(typhoon, be given names)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hurricane, be given names)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(hurricane, be given names)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hurricane, have names)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(hurricane, have names)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(hurricane, be given human names)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(hurricane, be given human names)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(hurricane, get names)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(hurricane, get names)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(typhoon, have names)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(typhoon, have names)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(typhoon, have different names)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(typhoon, have different names)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(tornado, have names)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(tornado, have names)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(hurricane, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(hurricane, be given female names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(storm, be given names)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(storm, have names)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(storm, get names)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(storm, be given female names)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(storm, need names)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given female names)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(storm, has state names)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(storm, be given female names)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(storm, be given female names)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(storm, have names)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(storm, get names)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(storm, need names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(storm, have names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(storm, has state names)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(storm, get names)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(storm, need names)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(storm, has state names)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(storm, get names)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(storm, has state names)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(storm, need names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(storm, be given names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(typhoon, be given names)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(typhoon, have names)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(typhoon, have different names)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tornado, have names)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(hurricane, be given names)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hurricane, have names)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hurricane, get names)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(hurricane, be given human names)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hurricane, be given female names)