storm: is female names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad weather
Weight: 0.66
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
, emergency
Weight: 0.59
, character
Weight: 0.58
Siblings typhoon
Weight: 0.74
, tornado
Weight: 0.71
, hurricane
Weight: 0.66
, rita
Weight: 0.63
, thunderstorm
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
is female names 1.00
have female names 0.99
be named female names 0.96
be given female names 0.95
be called women 's names 0.90
have women 's names 0.89
have names 0.86
be named names 0.85
be called names 0.85
be called girls names 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, have female names)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be given female names)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, have female names)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tornado, have names)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, have names)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, have names)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(typhoon, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(typhoon, have female names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hurricane, have female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hurricane, have female names)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(hurricane, be given female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(hurricane, be given female names)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hurricane, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(hurricane, have names)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(typhoon, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(typhoon, have names)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(tornado, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(tornado, have names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(storm, is female names)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(storm, be given female names)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(storm, be given female names)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(storm, be given female names)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(storm, have names)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(storm, have names)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(storm, have names)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given female names)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(storm, is female names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(storm, is female names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(typhoon, have female names)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(typhoon, have names)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hurricane, have female names)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tornado, have names)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hurricane, be given female names)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(storm, is female names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hurricane, have names)