storm: need names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad weather
Weight: 0.66
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
, emergency
Weight: 0.59
, character
Weight: 0.58
Siblings typhoon
Weight: 0.74
, tornado
Weight: 0.71
, hurricane
Weight: 0.66
, rita
Weight: 0.63
, thunderstorm
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
need names 1.00
have names 0.95
get names 0.94
be called names 0.92
have different names 0.91
be given names 0.90
has state names 0.89
have women 's names 0.86
be called women 's names 0.86
be named names 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, be given names)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tornado, have names)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, have different names)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, have names)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be given names)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, get names)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, have names)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hurricane, have names)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(hurricane, have names)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(hurricane, get names)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(hurricane, get names)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(typhoon, have names)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(typhoon, have names)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(typhoon, be given names)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(typhoon, be given names)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(tornado, have names)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(tornado, have names)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(typhoon, have different names)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(typhoon, have different names)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hurricane, be given names)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(hurricane, be given names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(storm, need names)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(storm, have names)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(storm, have names)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(storm, get names)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(storm, get names)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(storm, be given names)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(storm, have names)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(storm, get names)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(storm, be given names)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(storm, has state names)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(storm, be given names)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(storm, has state names)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(storm, get names)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given names)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(storm, has state names)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(storm, have names)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(storm, has state names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(storm, need names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(storm, need names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(typhoon, be given names)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(typhoon, have names)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(typhoon, have different names)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tornado, have names)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hurricane, have names)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hurricane, get names)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(storm, need names)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(hurricane, be given names)