story: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tale
Weight: 0.76
, fairy tale
Weight: 0.71
, article
Weight: 0.66
, topic
Weight: 0.66
Siblings jonah
Weight: 0.68
, genesis
Weight: 0.66
, myth
Weight: 0.65
, cinderella
Weight: 0.65
, gossip
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality wrong 0.85
is great 0.81
be in great gatsby 0.81
feel good 0.80
has quality news 0.79
was bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(article, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(story, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(article, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(story, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(article, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(article, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(article, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(article, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, was bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(gossip, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gossip, has quality wrong)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(gossip, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(gossip, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(article, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(story, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(article, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(story, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(gossip, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(gossip, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cinderella, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cinderella, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(gossip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(gossip, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cinderella, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cinderella, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(gossip, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(gossip, has quality wrong)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(gossip, feel good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(gossip, feel good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cinderella, was bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(cinderella, was bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(story, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(story, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(article, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(article, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(gossip, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(gossip, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cinderella, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cinderella, was bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(gossip, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(gossip, has quality wrong)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cinderella, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(article, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(article, has quality news)