stove: be better than gas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents household appliance
Weight: 0.64
, equipment
Weight: 0.61
, kitchen
Weight: 0.61
, heater
Weight: 0.61
, fireplace
Weight: 0.60
Siblings toaster oven
Weight: 0.38
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.37
, water heater
Weight: 0.37
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.36
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than gas 1.00
has state gas 0.85
has quality better 0.76
is more efficient now 0.75
make last longer food 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(heater, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(stove, be better than gas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(heater, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(heater, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(refrigerator, make last longer food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(heater, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(stove, be better than gas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(water heater, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(water heater, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(refrigerator, make last longer food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(refrigerator, make last longer food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(stove, be better than gas)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(stove, has state gas)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(stove, has state gas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(stove, has state gas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(stove, has state gas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(stove, be better than gas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(stove, be better than gas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(heater, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(refrigerator, make last longer food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(water heater, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(stove, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(heater, has quality better)