stove: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents household appliance
Weight: 0.64
, equipment
Weight: 0.61
, kitchen
Weight: 0.61
, heater
Weight: 0.61
, fireplace
Weight: 0.60
Siblings toaster oven
Weight: 0.38
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.37
, water heater
Weight: 0.37
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.36
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is quality 0.87
be bad for environment 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(heater, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(stove, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(stove, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fireplace, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(stove, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(fireplace, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(heater, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(heater, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(heater, has quality better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(heater, is quality)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fireplace, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(water heater, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is quality)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(refrigerator, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(heater, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(stove, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(stove, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fireplace, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(stove, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(water heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(water heater, is quality)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(water heater, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(water heater, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(refrigerator, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(refrigerator, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(stove, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(stove, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(stove, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(heater, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(heater, is quality)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fireplace, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(water heater, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(water heater, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(refrigerator, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(heater, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(heater, is quality)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(stove, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fireplace, be bad for environment)