straight line: has quality function

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents line
Weight: 0.81
, line segment
Weight: 0.70
, shape
Weight: 0.61
, configuration
Weight: 0.61
Siblings diagonal
Weight: 0.64
, row
Weight: 0.57
, tangent
Weight: 0.47
, hem
Weight: 0.46
, red line
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality function 1.00
is odd function 0.82
be important to protein function 0.81
has quality good 0.78
has quality right 0.77
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(straight line, has quality function)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(shape, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(straight line, has quality function)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(straight line, has quality function)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(shape, be important to protein function)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(shape, has quality right)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(shape, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(shape, be important to protein function)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality right)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(row, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(row, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(tangent, is odd function)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(straight line, has quality function)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(straight line, has quality function)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(shape, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(straight line, has quality function)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tangent, has quality function)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(tangent, is odd function)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tangent, is odd function)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(row, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(row, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(row, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(row, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(straight line, has quality function)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(straight line, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(shape, be important to protein function)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality right)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(tangent, has quality function)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tangent, is odd function)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(row, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(row, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(shape, be important to protein function)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality right)