strain: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.60
, quantity
Weight: 0.59
, effect
Weight: 0.55
, variable
Weight: 0.54
Siblings mutant
Weight: 0.51
, swelling
Weight: 0.33
, dislocation
Weight: 0.33
, chest pain
Weight: 0.32
, fracture
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94
be more important than quality 0.85
is more problematic 0.82
be in movies expensive 0.80
is more painful 0.79
be better than quality 0.78
cost money 0.77
has quality cost 0.77
is more common 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(strain, is more expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(effect, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(strain, is more expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(variable, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(strain, is more expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(quantity, be better than quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(strain, is more expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(quantity, be more important than quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(strain, is more expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(effect, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(strain, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(effect, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(quantity, be more important than quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(effect, be in movies expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(quantity, be better than quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(variable, has quality cost)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(effect, cost money)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(effect, be in movies expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(effect, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(effect, cost money)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality cost)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(quantity, be better than quality)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(quantity, be more important than quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mutant, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, is more common)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(strain, is more expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(quantity, be more important than quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(strain, is more expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(effect, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(strain, is more expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(variable, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(strain, is more expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(quantity, be better than quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(strain, is more expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(effect, be in movies expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(strain, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mutant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(mutant, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(dislocation, is more common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(dislocation, is more common)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(strain, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(strain, is expensive)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(strain, is expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(strain, is expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(strain, is more problematic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(strain, is more problematic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(strain, is expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(strain, is more problematic)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more problematic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(strain, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(quantity, be more important than quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(quantity, be better than quality)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(effect, be in movies expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(variable, has quality cost)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(effect, cost money)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(effect, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(dislocation, is more common)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mutant, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(effect, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(quantity, be more important than quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(quantity, be better than quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(effect, be in movies expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(variable, has quality cost)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(strain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(effect, cost money)