strategy: affect strategy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, objective
Weight: 0.65
, plan
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings approach
Weight: 0.70
, planning
Weight: 0.69
, framework
Weight: 0.68
, marketing
Weight: 0.65
, consolidation
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect strategy 1.00
is plan 0.79
important elements of are plan 0.77
affect method 0.77
affect structure 0.76
be called policy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(objective, affect method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(strategy, affect strategy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(policy, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(strategy, affect strategy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(policy, be called policy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(objective, affect method)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(objective, affect method)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(policy, be called policy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(marketing, important elements of are plan)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(marketing, is plan)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(objective, affect method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(strategy, affect strategy)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(policy, be called policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(strategy, affect strategy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(marketing, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(marketing, is plan)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(marketing, important elements of are plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(marketing, important elements of are plan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(strategy, affect strategy)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(strategy, affect structure)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(strategy, affect structure)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(strategy, affect structure)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(strategy, affect structure)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(strategy, affect strategy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(strategy, affect strategy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(policy, be called policy)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(objective, affect method)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(marketing, is plan)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(marketing, important elements of are plan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(policy, be called policy)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(strategy, affect strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(objective, affect method)