strategy: be important in environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, objective
Weight: 0.65
, plan
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings approach
Weight: 0.70
, planning
Weight: 0.69
, framework
Weight: 0.68
, marketing
Weight: 0.65
, consolidation
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in environment 1.00
be important in current environment 0.93
be important in global environment 0.92
has state environment 0.88
be important in current global environment 0.88
be important in counselling 0.83
be important in work 0.80
be important in business 0.79
really is important to business 0.78
very is important in company 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(objective, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(policy, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(objective, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(objective, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(marketing, has state environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(framework, be important in counselling)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(marketing, very is important in company)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(marketing, really is important to business)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(policy, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(objective, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(marketing, has state environment)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(marketing, has state environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(planning, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(planning, be important in business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(marketing, really is important to business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(marketing, really is important to business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(marketing, very is important in company)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(marketing, very is important in company)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(framework, be important in counselling)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(framework, be important in counselling)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(strategy, be important in environment)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current global environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(strategy, be important in current global environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current global environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in current global environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(policy, be important in work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(objective, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(marketing, has state environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(marketing, really is important to business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(planning, be important in business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(marketing, very is important in company)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(framework, be important in counselling)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(policy, be important in work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(objective, be important in business)