strategy: be important in management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, objective
Weight: 0.65
, plan
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings approach
Weight: 0.70
, planning
Weight: 0.69
, framework
Weight: 0.68
, marketing
Weight: 0.65
, consolidation
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in management 1.00
is management 0.95
be important in project management 0.90
was management change 0.89
be as function of management 0.87
is management function 0.87
is primary management function 0.84
be as primary function of management 0.84
be important in medication management 0.83
be important in supply chain management 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(policy, be important in medication management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in medication management)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in medication management)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(marketing, was management change)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(planning, is primary management function)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in project management)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(planning, is management function)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(planning, is management)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in supply chain management)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(marketing, is management)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(planning, be as function of management)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(policy, be important in medication management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(planning, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(planning, is management)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(marketing, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(marketing, is management)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(planning, be important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(planning, be important in project management)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(planning, be as function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(planning, be as function of management)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(planning, is management function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(planning, is management function)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(marketing, was management change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(marketing, was management change)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(planning, be as primary function of management)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(planning, be important in supply chain management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(planning, be important in supply chain management)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(planning, is primary management function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(planning, is primary management function)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(strategy, be important in management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(policy, be important in medication management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(planning, is management)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(marketing, is management)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(planning, be as function of management)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(planning, is management function)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(planning, be important in supply chain management)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, be important in project management)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, be as primary function of management)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(marketing, was management change)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(planning, is primary management function)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(strategy, be important in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(policy, be important in medication management)