strategy: be in teaching important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, objective
Weight: 0.65
, plan
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings approach
Weight: 0.70
, planning
Weight: 0.69
, framework
Weight: 0.68
, marketing
Weight: 0.65
, consolidation
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in teaching important 1.00
be important in teaching 1.00
be important teaching 1.00
be in teaching 0.97
be important for learning 0.87
affect method of teaching 0.86
be important in education 0.85
be important for teachers 0.83
is learning 0.83
be important in curriculum development 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(objective, affect method of teaching)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(objective, be important in education)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(objective, be important in curriculum development)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(policy, be important in education)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(method, be important in teaching)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in education)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(objective, affect method of teaching)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(objective, be important in education)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(objective, be important in curriculum development)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(objective, affect method of teaching)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(objective, be important in curriculum development)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(objective, be important in education)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in education)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(approach, be important in teaching)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(approach, be important teaching)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important for teachers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(approach, is learning)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(objective, affect method of teaching)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(objective, be important in education)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(objective, be important in curriculum development)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(policy, be important in education)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(approach, be important teaching)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(approach, be important teaching)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(approach, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(approach, be important in teaching)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(approach, is learning)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(approach, is learning)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(planning, be important for teachers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(planning, be important for teachers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(strategy, be in teaching important)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(strategy, be in teaching)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(strategy, be important for learning)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(strategy, be important for learning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(policy, be important in education)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(objective, affect method of teaching)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(objective, be important in education)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(objective, be important in curriculum development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(planning, be important for teachers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(approach, is learning)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(approach, be important teaching)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(approach, be important in teaching)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(policy, be important in education)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(objective, affect method of teaching)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(objective, be important in education)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(objective, be important in curriculum development)