straw: be at fast-food restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.58
, substance
Weight: 0.57
, fuel
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings steel wool
Weight: 0.33
, burlap
Weight: 0.32
, paper towel
Weight: 0.32
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.32
, raw material
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fast-food restaurant 1.00
be at febric store 0.77
be at grocery store 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(straw, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(straw, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(burlap, be at febric store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(straw, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(burlap, be at febric store)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(burlap, be at febric store)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(straw, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(paper towel, be at grocery store)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(paper towel, be at grocery store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(straw, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(straw, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(straw, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(straw, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(straw, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(straw, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(straw, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(straw, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(burlap, be at febric store)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(straw, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(paper towel, be at grocery store)