straw: is good insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents residue
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.58
, substance
Weight: 0.57
, fuel
Weight: 0.57
Siblings proboscis
Weight: 0.33
, steel wool
Weight: 0.33
, burlap
Weight: 0.32
, paper towel
Weight: 0.32
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good insulator 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(straw, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(straw, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(straw, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(steel wool, is good insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(straw, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(steel wool, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(steel wool, is good insulator)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(straw, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(straw, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(straw, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(straw, is good insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(straw, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(straw, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(straw, is good insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(straw, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(straw, is good insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(straw, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(steel wool, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(straw, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(paper towel, is good insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(straw, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is good insulator)