street: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scene
Weight: 0.63
, highway
Weight: 0.62
, roadway
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.61
, cross street
Weight: 0.61
Siblings alley
Weight: 0.65
, driveway
Weight: 0.60
, sidewalk
Weight: 0.35
, neighborhood
Weight: 0.35
, interstate highway
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality system 0.82
go bad 0.79
look bad 0.79
affect water quality 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cross street, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(street, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cross street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(street, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(roadway, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(street, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(roadway, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(street, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(highway, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(street, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(scene, look bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(street, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(highway, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(street, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(highway, affect water quality)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(street, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(highway, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(roadway, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cross street, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(roadway, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cross street, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(highway, affect water quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(highway, has quality system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(scene, look bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(highway, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cross street, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(roadway, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(highway, affect water quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cross street, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(roadway, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(scene, look bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(highway, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(driveway, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(neighborhood, go bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(interstate highway, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cross street, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(street, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cross street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(street, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(roadway, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(street, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(roadway, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(street, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(highway, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(street, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(highway, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(street, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(scene, look bad)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(street, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(highway, affect water quality)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(street, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(driveway, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(driveway, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(interstate highway, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(interstate highway, has quality system)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(neighborhood, go bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(neighborhood, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(street, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(street, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(street, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(street, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(street, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(highway, affect water quality)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(highway, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(roadway, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(roadway, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cross street, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(highway, has quality system)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cross street, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(scene, look bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(driveway, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(neighborhood, go bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(interstate highway, has quality system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(highway, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(roadway, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cross street, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(roadway, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cross street, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(highway, has quality system)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(highway, affect water quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(scene, look bad)