street: have typically tall lights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scene
Weight: 0.63
, highway
Weight: 0.62
, roadway
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.61
, cross street
Weight: 0.61
Siblings alley
Weight: 0.65
, driveway
Weight: 0.60
, sidewalk
Weight: 0.35
, neighborhood
Weight: 0.35
, interstate highway
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have typically tall lights 1.00
is lights 0.82
be yellow lights 0.81
be orange lights 0.80
be light pole bulbs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(highway, be light pole bulbs)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(street, have typically tall lights)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(highway, be light pole bulbs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(highway, be light pole bulbs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(driveway, is lights)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.18
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(highway, be light pole bulbs)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(street, have typically tall lights)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(driveway, is lights)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(driveway, is lights)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(street, have typically tall lights)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(street, be yellow lights)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(street, be orange lights)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(street, be orange lights)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(street, be orange lights)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(street, be yellow lights)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(street, be yellow lights)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(street, be orange lights)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(street, be yellow lights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(street, have typically tall lights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(street, have typically tall lights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(highway, be light pole bulbs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(driveway, is lights)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(street, have typically tall lights)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(highway, be light pole bulbs)