stretch: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.53
, area
Weight: 0.52
, option
Weight: 0.49
, factor
Weight: 0.49
Siblings leg
Weight: 0.59
, west point
Weight: 0.31
, zone
Weight: 0.31
, south park
Weight: 0.31
, shoreline
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
feel good 0.80
has quality marks 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(south park, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(zone, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(south park, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(south park, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(south park, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(south park, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(south park, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(zone, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(zone, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(stretch, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(stretch, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(stretch, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(stretch, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(stretch, feel good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(stretch, has quality marks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(stretch, feel good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(stretch, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(stretch, has quality marks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(stretch, has quality marks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(stretch, feel good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality marks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(stretch, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(south park, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(zone, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(south park, has quality good)