stretch: has quality marks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.53
, area
Weight: 0.52
, option
Weight: 0.49
, factor
Weight: 0.49
Siblings leg
Weight: 0.59
, west point
Weight: 0.31
, zone
Weight: 0.31
, south park
Weight: 0.31
, shoreline
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality marks 1.00
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality marks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(south park, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(stretch, has quality marks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(south park, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(south park, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(stretch, has quality marks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(stretch, has quality marks)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(stretch, has quality marks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(stretch, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(stretch, has quality marks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(stretch, has quality marks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(stretch, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(stretch, has quality marks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(stretch, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(stretch, has quality marks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(stretch, has quality marks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality marks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(stretch, has quality marks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(stretch, has quality marks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stretch, has quality marks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(south park, has quality good)