stretching: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents treatment
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, topic
Weight: 0.51
, damage
Weight: 0.46
Siblings running
Weight: 0.31
, yoga
Weight: 0.31
, acupuncture
Weight: 0.31
, walking
Weight: 0.30
, drill bit
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
feel good 0.80
feels good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(drill bit, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(yoga, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(walking, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(walking, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(yoga, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(running, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(running, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(walking, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(walking, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(yoga, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(yoga, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(running, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(running, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(drill bit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(drill bit, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(acupuncture, feel good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, feel good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(yoga, feel good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(yoga, feel good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(walking, feel good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(walking, feel good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(running, feel good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(running, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(stretching, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(stretching, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(stretching, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(stretching, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(stretching, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(stretching, feels good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(stretching, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stretching, feel good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(stretching, feel good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(stretching, feels good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(stretching, feels good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(stretching, feels good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(stretching, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(running, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(acupuncture, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(running, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(walking, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(running, feel good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(walking, feel good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(drill bit, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(yoga, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stretching, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(yoga, feel good)