strike: affect employment relationships

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.66
, attack
Weight: 0.61
, form
Weight: 0.61
, fight
Weight: 0.60
, movement
Weight: 0.60
Siblings raid
Weight: 0.33
, boycott
Weight: 0.33
, dismissal
Weight: 0.32
, counterattack
Weight: 0.32
, blast
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect employment relationships 1.00
make relationships stronger 0.80
be important in relationship 0.80
be good in relationship 0.80
occur in relationship 0.79
happen in relationship 0.78
affect businesses 0.76
affect economy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(fight, make relationships stronger)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(strike, affect employment relationships)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fight, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(strike, affect employment relationships)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fight, be good in relationship)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(strike, affect employment relationships)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(fight, happen in relationship)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(strike, affect employment relationships)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(fight, occur in relationship)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(strike, affect employment relationships)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(fight, occur in relationship)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fight, be good in relationship)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(fight, happen in relationship)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(fight, make relationships stronger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(fight, be important in relationship)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fight, be good in relationship)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fight, make relationships stronger)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fight, happen in relationship)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fight, be important in relationship)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(fight, occur in relationship)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(fight, make relationships stronger)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(strike, affect employment relationships)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fight, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(strike, affect employment relationships)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fight, be good in relationship)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(strike, affect employment relationships)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(fight, occur in relationship)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(strike, affect employment relationships)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(fight, happen in relationship)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(strike, affect employment relationships)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(strike, affect employment relationships)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(strike, affect economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(strike, affect economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(strike, affect economy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(strike, affect businesses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(strike, affect businesses)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(strike, affect economy)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(strike, affect businesses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(strike, affect businesses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(strike, affect employment relationships)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(fight, occur in relationship)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fight, happen in relationship)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fight, be important in relationship)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fight, be good in relationship)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(fight, make relationships stronger)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(fight, occur in relationship)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fight, happen in relationship)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fight, be important in relationship)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fight, be good in relationship)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(strike, affect employment relationships)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(fight, make relationships stronger)