stroke: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heart attack
Weight: 0.71
, blood clot
Weight: 0.68
, complication
Weight: 0.63
, killer
Weight: 0.61
, spinal cord
Weight: 0.61
Siblings heat stroke
Weight: 0.37
, atrial fibrillation
Weight: 0.36
, congestive heart failure
Weight: 0.35
, heart failure
Weight: 0.35
, liver cancer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality worse 0.84
is great 0.81
be with bad conncections 0.78
has quality function 0.78
has quality evil 0.78
has quality question 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blood clot, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(stroke, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(killer, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(stroke, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(heart attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(stroke, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(stroke, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(stroke, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(killer, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(stroke, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(stroke, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(blood clot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(stroke, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(blood clot, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(killer, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(heart attack, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(blood clot, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(complication, has quality question)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(killer, has quality evil)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(blood clot, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(killer, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(blood clot, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(heart attack, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(killer, has quality evil)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(heat stroke, has quality worse)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(heart failure, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blood clot, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(heart attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(killer, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(killer, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(blood clot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(stroke, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(heart failure, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(heart failure, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(heat stroke, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(heat stroke, has quality worse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(stroke, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(stroke, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(stroke, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(stroke, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(stroke, has quality worse)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(stroke, has quality worse)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(stroke, has quality worse)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality worse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(stroke, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(killer, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spinal cord, is quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(heart attack, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(killer, has quality evil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(heart failure, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(heat stroke, has quality worse)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(killer, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(heart attack, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spinal cord, is quality)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(stroke, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(killer, has quality evil)