structure: be relevant to company 's strategy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents building
Weight: 0.68
, modification
Weight: 0.63
, project
Weight: 0.63
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
Siblings pyramid
Weight: 0.73
, system
Weight: 0.72
, empire state building
Weight: 0.70
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.69
, arch
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be relevant to company 's strategy 1.00
follow strategy 0.84
be important in technology 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(structure, follow strategy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(structure, follow strategy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(structure, follow strategy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(structure, be important in technology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(structure, be important in technology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(structure, be important in technology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(structure, follow strategy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important in technology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(structure, be relevant to company 's strategy)