student: has go to class

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents college student
Weight: 0.75
, school district
Weight: 0.70
, graduate student
Weight: 0.67
, teacher
Weight: 0.67
Siblings intern
Weight: 0.69
, elementary school
Weight: 0.65
, school
Weight: 0.64
, good student
Weight: 0.63
, assistant
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
has go to class 1.00
go to class 0.97
requires go to class 0.96
be at in class 0.92
be used to class 0.92
be a part of class 0.90
has many class 0.90
be find in class 0.90
be at class room 0.86
be teach class 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(teacher, be at in class)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(student, has go to class)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(teacher, be find in class)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(student, has go to class)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(teacher, be at in class)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(teacher, be find in class)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(teacher, be at in class)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(teacher, be find in class)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(school, requires go to class)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(school, has many class)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(school, be used to class)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(teacher, be at in class)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(student, has go to class)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(teacher, be find in class)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(student, has go to class)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(school, requires go to class)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(school, requires go to class)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(school, be used to class)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(school, be used to class)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(school, has many class)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(school, has many class)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(student, has go to class)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(student, go to class)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(student, go to class)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(student, go to class)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(student, go to class)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(student, be at in class)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(student, be at in class)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(student, be a part of class)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(student, be at in class)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(student, be a part of class)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(student, be a part of class)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(student, be a part of class)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(student, be at in class)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(student, has go to class)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(student, has go to class)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(teacher, be at in class)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(teacher, be find in class)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(school, be used to class)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(school, requires go to class)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(school, has many class)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(teacher, be at in class)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(student, has go to class)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(teacher, be find in class)