study: be problematic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evaluation
Weight: 0.64
, journal
Weight: 0.64
, treatment
Weight: 0.60
, indicator
Weight: 0.60
Siblings report
Weight: 0.66
, cost benefit analysis
Weight: 0.64
, astronomy
Weight: 0.62
, proportion
Weight: 0.61
, literature
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problematic 1.00
is difficult 0.81
is beneficial 0.78
be important to mayans 0.77
is useful 0.76
seem helpful 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(evaluation, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(study, be problematic)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(indicator, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(study, be problematic)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(journal, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(study, be problematic)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(evaluation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(study, be problematic)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(treatment, seem helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(study, be problematic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(treatment, seem helpful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(evaluation, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(journal, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(indicator, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(evaluation, is difficult)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, is difficult)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(journal, is useful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(indicator, is useful)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, is useful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(treatment, seem helpful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be important to mayans)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is difficult)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(literature, is difficult)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(report, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(evaluation, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(study, be problematic)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(indicator, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(study, be problematic)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(journal, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(study, be problematic)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(evaluation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(study, be problematic)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(treatment, seem helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(study, be problematic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(report, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(report, is useful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(astronomy, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is useful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(literature, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(literature, is difficult)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(astronomy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is difficult)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(astronomy, be important to mayans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be important to mayans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(study, be problematic)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(study, is useful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(study, is beneficial)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(study, is useful)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(study, is beneficial)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(study, is beneficial)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(study, is useful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(study, is beneficial)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(study, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(study, be problematic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(treatment, seem helpful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(evaluation, is useful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(journal, is useful)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(indicator, is useful)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(evaluation, is difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(report, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(astronomy, be important to mayans)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(astronomy, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(astronomy, is difficult)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(literature, is difficult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(treatment, seem helpful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(evaluation, is useful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(journal, is useful)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(indicator, is useful)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(study, be problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(evaluation, is difficult)