study: science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evaluation
Weight: 0.64
, journal
Weight: 0.64
, treatment
Weight: 0.60
, indicator
Weight: 0.60
Siblings report
Weight: 0.66
, cost benefit analysis
Weight: 0.64
, astronomy
Weight: 0.62
, proportion
Weight: 0.61
, literature
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
science 1.00
is science 0.99
be important in science 0.94
be considered science 0.92
is earth science 0.90
is old science 0.89
be part of earth science 0.88
relate to science 0.87
is true science 0.86
be connected to science 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(indicator, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(study, science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(study, science)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(indicator, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(indicator, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is old science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is true science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be part of earth science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relate to science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is earth science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(indicator, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(study, science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(study, science)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(astronomy, is science)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(study, science)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(astronomy, is earth science)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is earth science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(study, science)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(astronomy, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be considered science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(study, science)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(astronomy, be part of earth science)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be part of earth science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(study, science)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(astronomy, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(astronomy, relate to science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(study, science)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(astronomy, is true science)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is true science)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(study, science)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(astronomy, is old science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is old science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(study, science)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(study, science)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(study, science)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(study, be connected to science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(study, be connected to science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(study, science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(study, be connected to science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(study, science)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(study, be connected to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(study, science)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(study, science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(study, science)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(study, science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(indicator, be important in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(astronomy, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(astronomy, is earth science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(astronomy, be part of earth science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(astronomy, relate to science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(astronomy, be considered science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(astronomy, is true science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(astronomy, is old science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(study, science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(indicator, be important in science)