styrofoam: be bad for earth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.62
, foam
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, container
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cardboard
Weight: 0.35
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.34
, cardboard box
Weight: 0.34
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for earth 1.00
be good for modelling 0.79
be bad for environment 0.78
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(foam, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for earth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(foam, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(container, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(foam, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(container, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(foam, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(plastic, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(foam, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(plastic, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cardboard, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cardboard, be bad for environment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(plastic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(plastic, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cardboard, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cardboard, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(styrofoam, be bad for earth)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(styrofoam, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for earth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(foam, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(foam, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cardboard, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cardboard, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(foam, be bad for environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(foam, has quality bad)