styrofoam: be good for modelling

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.62
, foam
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, container
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cardboard
Weight: 0.35
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.34
, cardboard box
Weight: 0.34
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for modelling 1.00
has quality good 0.85
is great 0.85
be bad for environment 0.81
has quality bad 0.81
has quality better 0.79
be bad for earth 0.79
is good material 0.78
is good heat 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(foam, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(foam, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(container, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(foam, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(container, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(foam, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(plastic, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(plastic, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is good material)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good material)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(foam, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(plastic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(plastic, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(plastic, is good material)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good material)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cardboard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cardboard, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(plastic, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cardboard, is good material)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cardboard, is good material)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cardboard, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cardboard, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(plastic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(plastic, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cardboard, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cardboard, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(styrofoam, be good for modelling)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is great)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good material)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good heat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is great)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is great)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(styrofoam, is great)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good heat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good material)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(styrofoam, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(styrofoam, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(styrofoam, is good heat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(styrofoam, is good material)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good heat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(foam, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(foam, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(foam, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cardboard, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(plastic, is good material)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cardboard, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cardboard, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cardboard, is good material)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(foam, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(foam, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(foam, has quality bad)