styrofoam: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.62
, foam
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, container
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cardboard
Weight: 0.35
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.34
, cardboard box
Weight: 0.34
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
be good for modelling 0.79
get better heat retention 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(container, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(foam, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(foam, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(container, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(plastic, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(plastic, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(plastic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(plastic, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cardboard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cardboard, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(plastic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(plastic, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cardboard, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cardboard, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(styrofoam, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(styrofoam, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(styrofoam, get better heat retention)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(styrofoam, get better heat retention)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, get better heat retention)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, get better heat retention)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(foam, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(foam, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cardboard, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cardboard, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(foam, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(styrofoam, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(foam, has quality bad)