styrofoam: have impact

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.62
, foam
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, container
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cardboard
Weight: 0.35
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.34
, cardboard box
Weight: 0.34
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have impact 1.00
have impact on environment 0.93
affect environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(plastic, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(plastic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(plastic, affect environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(styrofoam, have impact)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(styrofoam, have impact)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, affect environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(styrofoam, have impact)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(styrofoam, have impact)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(styrofoam, affect environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(styrofoam, have impact)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(styrofoam, affect environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(styrofoam, have impact)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(styrofoam, have impact)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(styrofoam, have impact)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(plastic, affect environment)