styrofoam: is good material

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.62
, foam
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, container
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cardboard
Weight: 0.35
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.34
, cardboard box
Weight: 0.34
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good material 1.00
is material 0.95
is good insulating material 0.83
is insulating material 0.79
be good for modelling 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is good material)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good material)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is material)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is material)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is material)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(plastic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good material)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cardboard, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cardboard, is good material)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(cardboard, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cardboard, is material)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(plastic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(plastic, is material)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(fiberglass, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is material)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(styrofoam, is good material)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is material)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(styrofoam, is material)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is material)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(styrofoam, is good insulating material)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(styrofoam, is insulating material)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is insulating material)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good insulating material)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is insulating material)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good insulating material)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is material)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good insulating material)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is insulating material)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good material)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cardboard, is material)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is material)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(plastic, is material)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(plastic, is good material)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cardboard, is good material)