:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(subaru, is car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(volvo, is car)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(subaru, is car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(nissan, is car)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(subaru, is car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(nissan, is good car)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(subaru, is car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(volvo, is car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(volvo, is car)
Salient implies Plausible
0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(subaru, is car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(subaru, is car)
Similarity expansion
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(subaru, is car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(subaru, is good car)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(subaru, is car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(subaru, is car)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(subaru, is car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(nissan, is car)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(subaru, is car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(volvo, is car)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(subaru, is car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(nissan, is good car)