subduction: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	process Weight: 0.59 , fact Weight: 0.36 , mechanism Weight: 0.33
Siblings	hydrolysis Weight: 0.33 , speciation Weight: 0.33 , fermentation Weight: 0.33 , oxidation Weight: 0.32 , combustion Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
is quality	0.91
has quality change	0.86
has quality worth	0.85
be good for environment	0.80
be bad for environment	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(fact, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(subduction, has quality good)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(subduction, has quality good)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(process, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(subduction, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(fact, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(process, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(mechanism, has quality bad)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(fact, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(process, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(speciation, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality change)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(combustion, be bad for environment)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(speciation, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(fact, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(subduction, has quality good)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(subduction, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(process, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(subduction, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(speciation, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(speciation, has quality worth)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(oxidation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(oxidation, has quality bad)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(speciation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(speciation, has quality bad)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(combustion, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(combustion, has quality bad)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(combustion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(combustion, has quality change)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(oxidation, has quality change)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(combustion, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(combustion, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(subduction, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(subduction, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(fact, has quality good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(process, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(speciation, has quality worth)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(speciation, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(combustion, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(oxidation, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(combustion, has quality change)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(oxidation, has quality change)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(combustion, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(fact, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(process, is quality)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(subduction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)