sublimation: has physical part process

Related concepts

Parents	process Weight: 0.47 , method Weight: 0.44 , loss Weight: 0.38 , change Weight: 0.37 , technology Weight: 0.35
Siblings	hydrolysis Weight: 0.31 , lamination Weight: 0.31 , oxidation Weight: 0.31 , diffusion Weight: 0.31 , photosynthesis Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has physical part process	1.00
is physical	0.82
is endothermic process	0.79
is physical change	0.78
is physical changes	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(photosynthesis, has physical part process)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(photosynthesis, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(photosynthesis, has physical part process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(sublimation, has physical part process)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(sublimation, is physical)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(sublimation, is physical changes)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is endothermic process)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(sublimation, is physical change)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(sublimation, is physical)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is physical)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is physical change)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(sublimation, is physical change)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(sublimation, is physical changes)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is physical changes)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(sublimation, is physical change)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(sublimation, is physical)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(sublimation, is physical changes)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(sublimation, is endothermic process)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(sublimation, is endothermic process)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(sublimation, is endothermic process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(sublimation, has physical part process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(sublimation, has physical part process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(diffusion, has physical part process)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(sublimation, has physical part process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(photosynthesis, has physical part process)