sublimation: is endothermic process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.47
, method
Weight: 0.44
, loss
Weight: 0.38
, change
Weight: 0.37
, technology
Weight: 0.35
Siblings hydrolysis
Weight: 0.31
, lamination
Weight: 0.31
, oxidation
Weight: 0.31
, diffusion
Weight: 0.31
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is endothermic process 1.00
is endothermic 0.94
has physical part process 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(process, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sublimation, is endothermic process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(process, is endothermic)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(process, is endothermic)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(photosynthesis, has physical part process)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photosynthesis, is endothermic)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(process, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sublimation, is endothermic process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(photosynthesis, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(photosynthesis, is endothermic)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(photosynthesis, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(photosynthesis, has physical part process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(sublimation, is endothermic process)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sublimation, is endothermic)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(sublimation, is endothermic)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(sublimation, is endothermic)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is endothermic)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sublimation, has physical part process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(sublimation, has physical part process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(sublimation, has physical part process)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, has physical part process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is endothermic process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sublimation, is endothermic process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(process, is endothermic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(diffusion, has physical part process)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(photosynthesis, has physical part process)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(photosynthesis, is endothermic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sublimation, is endothermic process)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(process, is endothermic)