sublimation: is physical change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.47
, method
Weight: 0.44
, loss
Weight: 0.38
, change
Weight: 0.37
, technology
Weight: 0.35
Siblings hydrolysis
Weight: 0.31
, lamination
Weight: 0.31
, oxidation
Weight: 0.31
, diffusion
Weight: 0.31
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is physical change 1.00
is physical changes 0.93
is physical 0.88
has quality change 0.84
has quality changes 0.81
has physical part process 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(photosynthesis, has physical part process)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(photosynthesis, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(photosynthesis, has physical part process)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(oxidation, has quality change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(sublimation, is physical change)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sublimation, is physical changes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(sublimation, is physical)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sublimation, is physical changes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, has quality change)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sublimation, is physical)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is physical changes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sublimation, has physical part process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is physical)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, has quality changes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(sublimation, is physical changes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sublimation, has quality change)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, has physical part process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(sublimation, has physical part process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(sublimation, is physical)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(sublimation, has quality change)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(sublimation, has physical part process)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(sublimation, has quality changes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(sublimation, has quality changes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(sublimation, has quality changes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sublimation, has quality change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is physical change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sublimation, is physical change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(diffusion, has physical part process)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(photosynthesis, has physical part process)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sublimation, is physical change)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(oxidation, has quality change)