submission: be important to woman

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.63
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.57
, agreement
Weight: 0.57
Siblings entry
Weight: 0.57
, choke
Weight: 0.48
, application
Weight: 0.33
, rejection
Weight: 0.32
, denial
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to woman 1.00
give security to woman 0.83
be in men 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(submission, be important to woman)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(submission, be important to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(issue, be in men)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(submission, be important to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(issue, be in men)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(submission, be important to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(submission, be important to woman)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(submission, be important to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(submission, be important to woman)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(submission, be important to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(submission, give security to woman)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(submission, be important to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(submission, give security to woman)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(submission, be important to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(submission, give security to woman)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(submission, be important to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(submission, give security to woman)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(submission, be important to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(submission, be important to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(submission, be important to woman)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(submission, be important to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(submission, be important to woman)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(submission, be important to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(issue, be in men)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(submission, be important to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(issue, be in men)