submission: give security to woman

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.63
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.57
, agreement
Weight: 0.57
Siblings entry
Weight: 0.57
, choke
Weight: 0.48
, application
Weight: 0.33
, rejection
Weight: 0.32
, denial
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
give security to woman 1.00
ask for security number 0.83
be important to woman 0.83
ask for social security number 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(submission, give security to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(application, ask for social security number)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(submission, give security to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(application, ask for security number)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(submission, give security to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(application, ask for security number) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(application, ask for security number)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(submission, give security to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(application, ask for social security number) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(application, ask for social security number)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(submission, give security to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(submission, give security to woman)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(submission, give security to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(submission, be important to woman)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(submission, give security to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(submission, be important to woman)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(submission, give security to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(submission, be important to woman)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(submission, give security to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(submission, be important to woman)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(submission, give security to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(submission, give security to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(submission, give security to woman)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(submission, give security to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(submission, give security to woman)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(submission, give security to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(application, ask for security number)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(submission, give security to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(application, ask for social security number)