subway: be better than mcdonalds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.59
, franchise
Weight: 0.58
, convenience store
Weight: 0.58
Siblings deli
Weight: 0.33
, bus stop
Weight: 0.33
, sidewalk
Weight: 0.32
, elevator
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than mcdonalds 1.00
go after mcdonalds 0.90
attack mcdonalds 0.84
get more expensive 0.77
have more restaurants than macas 0.77
be in nyc 0.77
be in boston called 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(subway, be better than mcdonalds)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(subway, have more restaurants than macas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(subway, have more restaurants than macas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(subway, have more restaurants than macas)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(subway, go after mcdonalds)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(subway, have more restaurants than macas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(subway, go after mcdonalds)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(subway, go after mcdonalds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(subway, attack mcdonalds)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(subway, go after mcdonalds)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(subway, attack mcdonalds)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(subway, be in nyc)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(subway, attack mcdonalds)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(subway, be in nyc)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(subway, be in nyc)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(subway, be in nyc)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(subway, be in boston called)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(subway, attack mcdonalds)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(subway, be in boston called)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(subway, get more expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(subway, get more expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(subway, be in boston called)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(subway, be in boston called)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(subway, get more expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(subway, get more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(subway, be better than mcdonalds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(subway, be better than mcdonalds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(subway, be better than mcdonalds)