success: be in industry difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents achievement
Weight: 0.68
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, publication
Weight: 0.58
, promise
Weight: 0.58
Siblings good luck
Weight: 0.66
, performance
Weight: 0.64
, defeat
Weight: 0.51
, encore
Weight: 0.50
, dodger
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in industry difficult 1.00
be in industry 0.89
is difficult 0.83
be in shaving industry difficult 0.83
be important in business 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(success, be in industry difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(performance, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(success, be in industry difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(performance, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(performance, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(success, be in industry difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(success, be in shaving industry difficult)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(success, be in shaving industry difficult)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(success, be in shaving industry difficult)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(success, be in industry)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(success, is difficult)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(success, is difficult)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(success, is difficult)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(success, be in shaving industry difficult)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(success, be in industry)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(success, is difficult)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(success, be in industry)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(success, be in industry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(success, be in industry difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(success, be in industry difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(performance, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(success, be in industry difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)