suffering: be for hollis in pictures

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents victim
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, injury
Weight: 0.58
, benefit
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chest pain
Weight: 0.33
, mental illness
Weight: 0.33
, dislocation
Weight: 0.32
, swelling
Weight: 0.32
, illness
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for hollis in pictures 1.00
be for hollis in pictures of hollis woods 0.83
is video 0.77
video 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(suffering, be for hollis in pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, is video)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(suffering, be for hollis in pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, video)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(suffering, be for hollis in pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(dislocation, video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(dislocation, video)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(suffering, be for hollis in pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(dislocation, is video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dislocation, is video)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(suffering, be for hollis in pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(suffering, be for hollis in pictures)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(suffering, be for hollis in pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(suffering, be for hollis in pictures of hollis woods)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(suffering, be for hollis in pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(suffering, be for hollis in pictures of hollis woods)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(suffering, be for hollis in pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(suffering, be for hollis in pictures of hollis woods)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(suffering, be for hollis in pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(suffering, be for hollis in pictures of hollis woods)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(suffering, be for hollis in pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(suffering, be for hollis in pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(suffering, be for hollis in pictures)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(suffering, be for hollis in pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(suffering, be for hollis in pictures)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(suffering, be for hollis in pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(dislocation, video)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(suffering, be for hollis in pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(dislocation, is video)