suffering: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	victim Weight: 0.59 , factor Weight: 0.59 , injury Weight: 0.58 , benefit Weight: 0.57 , condition Weight: 0.56
Siblings	chest pain Weight: 0.33 , mental illness Weight: 0.33 , dislocation Weight: 0.32 , swelling Weight: 0.32 , illness Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
feel good	0.80
has consistency density	0.77
has quality definition	0.76
has quality questions	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(injury, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(suffering, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(injury, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(injury, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(chest pain, feel good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(chest pain, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(dislocation, has consistency density)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(swelling, has quality questions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(injury, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(suffering, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(swelling, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(swelling, has quality bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(swelling, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(swelling, has quality good)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(chest pain, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(chest pain, feel good)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(swelling, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(swelling, has quality questions)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(chest pain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(chest pain, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(dislocation, has consistency density) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(dislocation, has consistency density)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(dislocation, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(dislocation, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(suffering, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(suffering, has quality bad)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(suffering, has quality bad)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(suffering, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(suffering, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(swelling, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(swelling, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(chest pain, feel good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(dislocation, has consistency density)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(swelling, has quality questions)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(chest pain, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(dislocation, has quality definition)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(suffering, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)