sugar glider: be illegal in pa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.59
, creature
Weight: 0.58
, possum
Weight: 0.56
, animal
Weight: 0.55
Siblings hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.33
, sea otter
Weight: 0.33
, tree frog
Weight: 0.33
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.33
, water buffalo
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in pa 1.00
be illegal in alaska 0.79
is illegal 0.78
be illegal in nyc 0.78
be illegal in singapore 0.77
be illegal in california 0.77
be illegal in pennsylvania 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in california)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in pennsylvania)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in pennsylvania)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in california)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in pennsylvania)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in california)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in california)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in pennsylvania)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in nyc)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in nyc)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in nyc)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in nyc)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sugar glider, is illegal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in singapore)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in alaska)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(sugar glider, is illegal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, is illegal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, is illegal)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in singapore)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in singapore)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in singapore)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in alaska)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in alaska)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in alaska)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in pa)