sunspot: be related to powerful fields

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, factor
Weight: 0.52
, concern
Weight: 0.49
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.33
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32
, aurora borealis
Weight: 0.32
, graph
Weight: 0.31
, solar eclipse
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to powerful fields 1.00
be related to fields 0.93
be related to powerful magnetic fields 0.91
be related to magnetic fields 0.86
be related 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(activity, be related)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(activity, be related)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factor, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(activity, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(graph, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(activity, be related)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(graph, be related)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(graph, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sunspot, be related to fields)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sunspot, be related to fields)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sunspot, be related to powerful magnetic fields)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sunspot, be related to fields)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(sunspot, be related to powerful magnetic fields)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sunspot, be related to fields)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sunspot, be related to magnetic fields)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(sunspot, be related to magnetic fields)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(sunspot, be related to powerful magnetic fields)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(sunspot, be related to magnetic fields)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sunspot, be related to powerful magnetic fields)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(sunspot, be related)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sunspot, be related)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sunspot, be related to magnetic fields)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sunspot, be related)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sunspot, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(activity, be related)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(graph, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(activity, be related)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(sunspot, be related to powerful fields)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)