super: is junior problematic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.58
, word
Weight: 0.56
, film
Weight: 0.54
, model
Weight: 0.52
Siblings super bowl
Weight: 0.63
, olympic games
Weight: 0.32
, chess game
Weight: 0.31
, avengers
Weight: 0.31
, max
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is junior problematic 1.00
is junior popular 0.90
is junior 0.88
is problematic 0.84
is junior fans called 0.78
is junior fans 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(super, is junior problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(super, is junior problematic)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(super, is junior problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(super, is junior)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(super, is junior problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(super, is junior)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(super, is junior problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(super, is junior fans called)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(super, is junior problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(super, is junior fans)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(super, is junior problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(super, is junior fans called)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(super, is junior problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(super, is junior)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(super, is junior problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(super, is junior fans called)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(super, is junior problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(super, is junior fans called)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(super, is junior problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(super, is junior fans)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(super, is junior problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(super, is junior fans)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(super, is junior problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(super, is junior fans)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(super, is junior problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(super, is junior)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(super, is junior problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(super, is junior problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(super, is junior problematic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(super, is junior problematic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(super, is junior problematic)