supermarket: be used to buy can good

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.76
, convenience store
Weight: 0.71
, food store
Weight: 0.71
, business
Weight: 0.59
, store
Weight: 0.58
Siblings shop
Weight: 0.65
, grocery
Weight: 0.39
, hardware store
Weight: 0.37
, restaurant
Weight: 0.37
, bakery
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to buy can good 1.00
be used to buy good 0.94
be used to buy can food 0.92
be used to buy thing that you need 0.91
be used to buy thing that you want 0.91
requires buy what you want 0.91
causes buy thing you do not need 0.89
be used to sell good 0.88
causes you may find something to buy 0.88
wants to buy something 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(store, be used to buy good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(supermarket, be used to buy can good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(store, be used to buy good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(store, be used to buy good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(shop, be used to sell good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(shop, be used to buy good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(shop, requires buy what you want)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(shop, be used to buy thing that you want)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(shop, be used to buy thing that you need)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(store, be used to buy good)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(supermarket, be used to buy can good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(shop, be used to buy good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(shop, be used to buy good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(shop, be used to buy thing that you need)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(shop, be used to buy thing that you need)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(shop, be used to buy thing that you want)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(shop, be used to buy thing that you want)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(shop, requires buy what you want)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(shop, requires buy what you want)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(shop, be used to sell good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(shop, be used to sell good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(supermarket, be used to buy can good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(supermarket, be used to buy can food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, be used to buy can food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(supermarket, be used to buy can food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(supermarket, be used to buy can food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, be used to buy can good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(supermarket, be used to buy can good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(store, be used to buy good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(shop, be used to buy thing that you need)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(shop, be used to buy thing that you want)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(shop, requires buy what you want)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(shop, be used to buy good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(shop, be used to sell good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(supermarket, be used to buy can good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(store, be used to buy good)