supermarket: waste food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.76
, convenience store
Weight: 0.71
, food store
Weight: 0.71
, food chain
Weight: 0.62
, shopping center
Weight: 0.59
Siblings shop
Weight: 0.65
, carrefour
Weight: 0.50
, grocery
Weight: 0.39
, hardware store
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
waste food 1.00
have food 0.82
have recycling 0.78
have healthy food 0.76
add water to meat 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(grocery store, have healthy food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(supermarket, waste food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(grocery store, have food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(supermarket, waste food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(grocery store, have food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(grocery store, have healthy food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, have healthy food)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, have food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(grocery store, have food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(supermarket, waste food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(grocery store, have healthy food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(supermarket, waste food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(supermarket, waste food)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(supermarket, have recycling)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, have recycling)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, add water to meat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(supermarket, add water to meat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(supermarket, have recycling)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(supermarket, add water to meat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(supermarket, have recycling)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(supermarket, add water to meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, waste food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(supermarket, waste food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(grocery store, have food)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(grocery store, have healthy food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(grocery store, have food)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(supermarket, waste food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(grocery store, have healthy food)