supernova: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents star
Weight: 0.69
, object
Weight: 0.56
, solar system
Weight: 0.55
, galaxy
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings comet
Weight: 0.36
, quasar
Weight: 0.35
, nebula
Weight: 0.35
, rock star
Weight: 0.35
, meteor
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality standard 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(supernova, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(supernova, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(supernova, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(supernova, has quality standard)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(supernova, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(supernova, has quality standard)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(supernova, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(supernova, has quality standard)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(supernova, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(supernova, has quality standard)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(supernova, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(supernova, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(supernova, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(supernova, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(supernova, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(supernova, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(supernova, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(supernova, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(supernova, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(supernova, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(supernova, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(supernova, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(supernova, has quality bad)